Tuesday 22 November 2016

REFLECTIONS ...




DESIGNING AN URBAN SPACE ...  something i can be, ... within it.


I like the idea in the Book, The Image of a City by   Kevin Lynch that says, “the design of a City is a temporal art” and that “its image is soaked in memories and meanings”. In the point of view of a practicing architect like me, who is used to design and construct buildings for the Client, i see my work as the one i can dream of, while it is still on its design phase and the one i can touch while it is being constructed.  But after the project is turned over,  its already just a thing to look at,  to watch that building deteriorates or to watch it being revived again, usually by other architects already. This i realize that the sensorial effectivity  of doing a building for a client is on the eyes and the touch only.

But  designing an Urban Space, like a City, especially when You yourself as the designer is a Citizen of that place brings you to the totality of your  senses including your 6th sense which are  the intuition-fear-anxiety-speculations  and guesses.  As urban designers, we are not just spectacles but we are a part of it. Inside it,...within it.

I never had this feeling before even since i became a Contractor of a 30Million  Palms Resort in Boracay, modesty aside. Because  though i consider it as my biggest project so far, yet, its finished and already turned over, and i am in Manila now. I may just feel it when i go back to Boracay again and stay in that Resort. A little knowledge of Urban Design thru a one term subject  Arc 213 had shifted my paradigm. It had given me a wider and clearer mirror and see more meaning in the profession.

I lament on those audience composed of architects several years ago when the famous Urban Planner Nathaniel von Einsiedel was talking to them. It seems before they listened to those speeches, they must had taken first this subject: Planning to easily relate to the principles discussed. Now i see, it is only when you capture the Theory of Planning where you can appreciate the meaning of it and relate to the sentiments of many planners when they bombarded the Metro Manila situations and other cities outside the country.


REFLECTION  ON GOVERNANCE

Just a week ago, i was in close argument  with my previous college professor, Arch Manuel Tingson of University of San Agustin. It was about the filling-in of portions of Iloilo River named and awarded as the Longest Landscaped River Esplanade in the Country. My professor advised as , “in Urban Design , work with politicians” , this is a sour sound to me. All my life i did not ever wanted to work  with politicians, and even go out labelling those designers as puppets of politicians. 

Yet, the topics on Governance in this subject had opened my eyes to realized and see the difference. When an architect constructs a Mall, he will just deal with construction crew and his budget to complete it. When designing a city and constructing portions of it, you deal with human being as part of it. As what Peter Webber says: “ the process of moulding the form of the city through time”.

BEING LOST IN MY OWN CITY

It is said that a good environmental image gives its possessor an important sense of emotional security. A well planned community may easily direct people’s activity to its route and destination . All these i agree, and that i also agree to the fact that  cities needs revitalization, renewed and shall be made economically sound and sustainable. But there is the reality in its sentimental value of the matter. The permeability of the urban design, not just in the artistic sense but on the  economic-social condition.  Cities whom the original inhabitants were used to, and spent their years,  are now, just by the quick computer presentation and release of Infrastructure Funds are scraped-off and changed to what all of us designers say Green Cities.

In a way, the time for acceptance of the people of the design in the way they perceive it and react to the new environment is so fast.  With the saturation of mass media, even the outskirts are reached with images of propaganda on how your city will be as political promises. Personally, i had seen many images of the bridge of the famous Architect Calatrava of Spain published in the net that says, this will be your new bridge.. this and that.



And now that IT got its way, its vital to consider if the legibility of the urban structure blends in same pace with the mindset of the people. Reason why people cannot cooperate with the city ordinances is because, ordinances are treated like “ posting a poster of Do this..Do that.. or else..???...”  It has to be considered that still, the participation of the people in moulding ordinances is its ticket to obedience and support.

The long and quite ( though i accept, they are stagnant bushes and swamps)  that were once builders of memories are now changed into Esplanades, walk able parks and i am saddened of the piers and river banks who still posses their natural curves and remains of piers posts, are now changed to high-tech marina with resto –bars. Yes, this is gaining taxes for the city and its good now.. the city is still clean. But had you thought of all these developments after 5  or 10 years?  Where will be the wastes of these resto along the walk able parks will go?

It is not that we don’t like developments. It is because there is that identity and harmonious relationship between the man and the ecology of these places that now, in the strike of many backhoe and bulldozers  getting title recognitions and DPWH Funds.

Sad to say, i feel lost in my city due to the rapid modernization that had been useful for the economy but defeats the inhabitants belongingness. I feel lost in my city because the state of mind of the city  administrators are now changed. They become friends of the investors who are not Illongos but businessmen from other places. And the most saddest part is, when you rise up and question, you will be tagged as” kontra-partido” a political term baptized for those who seem like does not like what the present political party is doing in handling the city.

What else do we sacrifice to have a good Urban Design other than facing-out  our old and harmonious communion with our sprawling community called now the “IS” term for  illegal settlers and the continues educating of the constituents. Are we fitting to what nature wants us to be? Or are we the one now,  traversing nature due to our own greed for power and recognition. Is this saving for Human Survival? Or building-up human quest for more satisfaction that later even the whole world can no longer  accommodate.

I am in the Island of Panay until i age 25 years old and had witnessed how the island of Boracay is now,  compared to 1975. Now, many Urban and Environmental Planners flip-up their drafting table upside down. There is no more land in Boracay Island to dramatize, all are already owned , if not titled, by rights. Here, another meaning of being LOST  in your city is clear. The old inhabitants now, lost their city in its face because they were driven away.

MANIPULATORS OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT

Its surprising to read this line....” As manipulators of the physical environment, city planners are primarily interested in the external agent in the interaction which produces the environmental image.”  The definition of the word manipulator as stated in www.yourdictionary.com  says, “ is the person or machine that does a job with skill or shrewdly manages something to their benefit.” Oftentimes we hear and we wanted to believe, for the good of the people, to be sustainable, for clean and Green.... hopefully and stand firm it is not for the politiceans monetary benefit. At this point, the word “ manipulators”  shall be referred to the Politiceans if they are permitted to manipulate the physical environment and make urban designers only as illustrators.

A town mayor had ordered for a design of a covered court in front of an Old Historical Municipal Hall in one of the towns in Visayas. The Architect in the municipal council contradicted to the idea because it will defeat the historical image of the town, cover the historical Municipal Hall. Still the  Mayor proceeded with, kick-out that contradicting architect by saying , “this is my town “..and requested funds for the structurally sound monster court that covered the ever graceful mementos of the town glorious past. The townfolks sigh.. this is not our town anymore.. this is Town of the Mayor.

Grant the people its belongingness because the people are part of forming the city. Permit the people to own and be proud of the image of their city and slowly blend them to the so- called diversification leading to sustainability. These  imageability hits my imagination of the simple urban area of Marinduque and Bagiou, both are on mountain –like images of a City which are very opposite to the City of Manila and Las Pinas, both in Flat land.

In effect, going back again to my City, Iloilo, it imageability is brought about by the rivers curving like “tears on a woman’s face”. This made me anxious of up to what extent modernization  will occur, if they are now able to fill-in portions of the kilometers of the rivers, time will come that they will fully cover the rivers and convert it to the entirely land for use. And i am looking forward to miss to see ...the Iloilo River that looks like ..” tears on a woman’s face”.

URBAN  ART IS ENTIRELY A DIFFERENT ART

My impression of Landscape design is like a small scale of a city design. In landscape design, what your perspective now is not yet there when you started because plants did not grow yet, and it will reach a point when such perspective of yours will meet with what the status of the actual, but wait a while and the plants will grow unmanageable and the image of that Landscape you did will go beyond what  you expected. 

This is because, in Landscape, we deal with the living plants and elements. More with the city, we live with everything, not just living humans, flora and fauna, but we live with the evolution of the mindsets of every individual. And since the art of urban design has to deal with the two-the observer and the observed, then, its image to the observer maybe different depending on the evolution of mindsets of the observer at a given time. Here now, i agree that the designers are like psychologists in this tasks.

Flanagan said... there is such a thing as “the landscape of our confusion” , yes there is and i feel that fear now after knowing what urban design is all about. It is because, if the art ( city design) and the audience ( the people) grows together, there are uncontrollable aspects that not only one person can control but needs the designer (art) and the administrators or governance ( the people) . In this sense, i feel “fear” realizing how necessary education has to be for City Administrator. 

How many of our high Government officials took up urban designing. There are a few of them and the effect of the knowledge such city administrator has is really visible affecting good directions of public infrastructure. Considering governance as a vital element in urban design, then the City Mayor becomes a city architect  on its own, relatively. 


Let me end this reflection by the phrases from the Book: Thermal Delight in Architecture by Lisa Hechong....

A sixteenth-century traveller furnished an eyewitness description of the delights of a Persian garden during its golden age:

“The garden I shall describe was constructed in such a way that two courses of crystal-clear water met before a building, forming a large lake in which country swans, geese and ducks disposed themselves. Below this lake were seven waterfalls – as many as there are planets ... From the lake jets of water spouted up so high into the air that the spray, as it descended, was like a rain of diamonds. How often was i moved by the rippling of the fountains and the murmuring of the brook as it streamed downhill, over the terraces of the garden, hemmed in by rose bushes, willows and acacias. I cried with sheer joy until the exceeding beauty and the rucshing of the water rocked me to sleep”


LET  DEVELOPMENTS  TAKE ITS PLACE BUT LEAVE US OUR HEARTS

Many books will still be written and many theories in Planning will still be strengthened. The findings and principles today may twist years from now, depending again on the global community, the rise of political issues and the economy. Urbanism had been defined since the times of the Romans in their own way of shaping it. And now that many countries of the so-called 3rd world is on its height of Urbanism, these are already unstoppable. 
           
            New propaganda will emerge and new psycho wars will threaten the human race. Unnoticed are the threatening of global warming and other famine as a weapon to distract   and destroy concentration and sway towards the country’s ruler’s financial gain. In all these, my only wish is to let developments take its place but please give a space for human senses, the sensitivity of the designers shall remain to protect the human sense of living on this earth be protected from the roaring concrete jungle of the hybrid city.


References:
·        Image of the City by Kevin Lynch
·      Thermal Delight in Architecture by Lisa Hechong
·      Urban Design-Methods and Techniques by Cliff Moughtin, Rafael Cuesta,
Christine Sarris and Paola

No comments:

Post a Comment