Monday 21 November 2016

THE VISION OF MY CITY





Abstract:       “Throughout the centuries there were men who took the first steps, down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision...” ... Ayn Rand.




                        And this is how  the Vision of a City made significant. The City of Manila, being the second densest city in the world in 2013 as expressed in its  Demography, has a rapid population growth at 1, 652,171,  seen in year 2010.  The city with 16 administrative districts where the 100 zones belong,  is dramatically located as the core of the National Capital Region ( NCR)  bounded by the historical Manila Bay on its west. At present, its holding on  tight to its Visionary Future.

This paper on The Vision of My City (Manila City) shows a situationaire on the year 2012, during the Lim Administration when a Manila Urban Development Project Proposal was drafted by the City Planning and Development Office for a Presentation to the World Bank Consultant in the person of Ms. Julia Nebrija. The Proposal was  dated May 30, 2012. This were clearly layed-out the framework, the proposals and the conclusion.

The information shown in the preceeding articles  were gathered  by the writer thru a written communication with the Chief Personnel, HRMO-5 of the Programs and Research Services of the City and the Office of the Manila City Planning and Development Office. These two offices are considered “ think-tank”  in the aspects of  Manila City Urbanism issues.

The last part of this paper shows the 12 Urban Development Challenges for the Manila Financial Center considered as the gear for a big leap that still needs for several Urban Studies and Plans. Also included are the 7 work plan of how these challenges can be meet. Illustrated below are the Manila Urban Development Proposals started in year 2012. These are the potential National and Local Government, public and private sector, medium to large scale and community-based development proposals for partnerships. The city boasts for the Target Urban Development outcomes, just evident that these writings on paper will be workable.

Manila is the main part of the Metro Manila Vision  for 2016 – that is - Vision of a world-class, vibrant, safe and healthy metropolis.


Introduction


Years were a witness to the struggle of the City of Manila from many factors for Development. Worth mentioning  are the effects of political stability that dictates a political will-power to makes things done for the Manila.
 In the year 2012, a compendium of Urban Development Proposals under the Lim Administration was seen workable. It is package thru a presentation done for proposals on international  financing.  The scope of the presentation are the potential partnerships of the  National and Local Government, public and private sector, community–based and medium to large-scaled Urban Development  


1.1                    Background:

The milestones of the presentation are in three significant moves. First is the task of crafting of this presentation given to the City Planning & Development Office Urban Design Division (cpdo-udd) on 13 April 2012 Friday.
The second was the Memorandum dated 2 April 2012 issued by Executive Secretary Paquito N. Ochoa Jr. with the subject” Proposed Development Projects for the City of Manila.
The third is making this presentation as a highlight of the 5 Major Urban Development Projects and the 9 Support Development Projects.


1.2       Manila Target Urban Development Outcomes
·         Focusing not only on the product but also in the process – Participatory Urban Planning process develops a people’s sense of Ownership.
·         Creating Community- Based Urban Regeneration Initiatives – Site Specific urban planning and design distinct to that of a specific community and urban planning initiatives produced by stakeholders’ active participation assures appropriateness and effectiveness.
·         Bonding the present with the past and building for the future – Continuity of Urban Planning and Design context that addresses the needs of the present while giving respect to the old, thereby building a future that is appreciative of the past.



1.3       The Framework

There were three Framework created as the Conceptual Framework, Legal Framework and the Planning Framework.


1.      Conceptual Framework- The Conceptual Framework illustrates the segments as the Kalunsuran ( City) “Efficiency” , the Katauhan (Citizenry) “Equity” and the Kapatiran (Collaboration) “Effectiveness” . A direct link to the Kalunsuran is the Kultura as the 4th  segment. It is the (Culture of the Community) The Urban Identity & Heritage Resource or the “ Essence”
The Conceptual Framework draws a straight traversing line with Heritage Conservation and the Community Block & Corridor Revitalization.

2.      Legal Framework - The Legal Framework based on the Manila Comprehensive  Land Use, Planning and Zoning Ordinance (MCLUPZO) 2006 as its consideration.  
On Heritage Preservation,  one of the MCLUPZO’s three Overlay Zones that shall be used primarily for areas containing registered historical/cultural heritage that deserve special consideration for protection and conservation due to their special character, architectural value or aesthetic interest wherein they contribute to the City’s collective understanding of its historical development and cultural heritage.

On the Community Block and Corridor Revitalization, Planned Unit Development Overlay Zone (O-PUD), One of the MCLUPZO’s three Overlay Zones that are identified specific sites in the City wherein the project site is comprehensively planned as entity via unitary site [lan which permits flexibility in planning/design, building siting, complementary in building types and land uses, usable open spaces and the preservation of significant land features.

3.      Planning Framework – The Planning Framework which is shown as Medium-Term Manila Development Plan 2010-2013 an Anchorage Policy of the three as the Kalunsuran (City) Resource provides Efficiency), the Katauhan (Citizenry) Capability enhances Equity and the Kapatiran (Collaboration) Joint-Venture assures Effectiveness.
A Component Policy Program making the KKK as Development Pillars creates a stronger stand as :
a.       Kagalingang Panlipunan (Social Development)
b.      Kasaganaan ng Ekonomiya ( Economic Development)
c.       Kaunlarang Pisikal ( Physical Development).

The Anchorage Policy and the Component Policy is then made workable by the Anchor Development Programs.

The  first  Anchor Development program  is the Kagalingang Panlipunan that has 5 sub-programs.
These are the 1.  Kalusugan ng Katawan at Katauhan ( Healthcare and Wellness)  2. Karunungan, Kultura at Palakasan (Education, Culture and Sports) 3. Kaligtasan, Kapayapaan at Kaayusan (Disaster Management and Protective Services) 4. Kapakanang Panlipunan at Programang Pabahay (Social Welfare and Housing Program) and 5 Kagalingan sa Pamamahala (Excellence-Oriented Governance)

The second Anchor Development program  is the Kasaganaan at Ekonomiya that has 5 sub-programs.
These are the 1. Kasiglahan sa Kabuhayan (Livelihood,Cooperative Development,Labor and employment, 2. Kaunlaran ng Imprastruktura (Public Enterprises, Roads & Bridges and Utilities: Power,Water & Communcation) 3. Kaakit-akit na Turismo (Tourism Development) 4. Kalakasan ng Kalakalan at Industriya (Trade and Industry) 5. Katatagan ng Kaban at Pananalapi (Fiscal Strength and Financial Sector)

The third Anchor Development program is the Kaunlarang Pisikal that has 5 sub-programs.
These are the 1. Kapakinabangang Pamamahala ng Kalupaan (Land Use Domain) 2. Kalinisan ng Luntian Kapaligiran (Built Environment Domain)  3. Kaisahang Pangangasiwa ng Basura at Polusyon ( Natural Environment Domain) 4. Kaayusan ng Pampublikong Transportasyon(Urban Transportation Domain) 5. Kalunsurang Pagpapanibago (Urban Renewal Domain)


1.4       The Proposals:
Five (5)  Major Urban Development Projects


a.      Revitalization @ Escolta : A Heritage Urban Quarter Development Plan
·         A community-based Urban Revitalization Plan currently being formulated by the City Government with its dynamic area stakeholders.
·         It generally aims to revitalize Escolta and its vicinity by preserving its rich heritage and developing it as the BPO-KPO-IT and ARTS & Architectural Heritage Corridor with Waterfront Development.

The Potential Project Components (PPP) are the following:
·         BPO-KPO-IT,
·         Pedestrian Mall
·         Escolta Arki-G: Architectural Heritage Living Gallery
·         Escolta Wharf: Riverwalk Cafés & Bars
·         Artists HAVEN: Streetscape Development
A Declaration of Support on the Revitalization @ Escolta was signed on March 15, 2012.

b.      Manila Central Post Office Renewal – Urban Renewal of Philpost Building, Liwasang Bonifacio & Metropolitan Theater. Public – Private –Partnership (Preservation, Restoration, Renewal)

·         Opportunity to present iconic architecture and historical landmarks and create a vibrant tourist spot in Manila.
·         Generate revenue for the Philippines government in the form of concession fess, taxes and another forms of compensation as maybe agreed under the PPP.
·         Stimulate investments by the private sector
·         Novel business concept that takes advantage of historical landmarks
·         Access to the fast-growing tourism and retail industries in the Philippines.

Iconic Areas are Manila Central Post Office (MCPO) Building  (c.1926), Liwasang Bonifacio Park (c.1940) and Metropolitan Theatre (c.1920)

c.       Manila Civic Center Development: A Civic Center Development Plan\

·         A Masterplan strengthening the image of the Civic Center of Manila proposed by the CPDO and currently being crafted by the CPDO-UDD.
·         It generally aims to revitalize Manila City Hall Building and its immediate vicinity thereby strengthening its image as the City’s Civic Center

Potential Project Components (PPC)
Rehabilitation, Revitalization & Preservation of the following:

1.      Manila City Hall Building
2.      Bonifacio Shrine
3.      Heritage Block with GSIS Building, etc
4.      City College of Manila /UDM & Mehan Gardens
5.      LRT 1 Central Terminal
6.      DCS & Arroceros Park

d.      Basecological Community Development: Development of Baseco Ecological Community
A Masterplan that  aims to transform the Baseco Compound into an ecological and sustainable community proposed by the CPDO.

Potential Project Components (PPC)
1.      Physical Development
2.      Economic Development
3.      Social Development

e.       Manila Financial Center Development: The Development of Manila’s Financial District
The transformation and development of the South Port Area and its Vicinity into Manila’s Financial District as envisioned by Mayor Alfredo Lim

Potential Project Components (PPC)
1.      Mixed-Use High-Rise Green Building Development
2.      Business Improvement District/ Economic Zone
3.      Print Media Urban Quarter
4.      International Cruise Harbor & Tourism Industry
5.      Histo-Cultural Heritage Preservation

6.      Entertainment Waterfront Development


1.      Nine (9) Support Development Projects
a.        zenry) Capability enhances Equity and the Kapatiran (Collaboration) Joint-Venture assures Effectiveness. urBaseco Waterfront
b.      Manila Financial Center Eco-Linkages @ Intramuros, Manila Ocean Park, Rizal Park and Roxas Boulevard.
c.       Monuments corridor @Roxas Boulevard
d.      Armay and Navy Club
e.       Manila Bay Wharf
f.       The 12 Storey Ospital ng Maynila
g.       Manila Zoo
h.      Paraiso ng Batang Maynila
i.        Rizal Memorial


Concept Brief of the South Harbor District Development: The Development of Manila’s Financial District by Rodolfo D. Reyes, Economic Division Chief, CPDO

Development Components:


1.      Harbour Towers – Offering panoramic views of Manila Bay and the Historic Intramuros, the Towers will house optimally designed offices and commercial spaces for world-class businesses.

2.      Harbour Mall – Based on the concept of a modern shopping mall, an array of finance-related activities and services can be contained under one roof designed specifically for capital markets, such as the New Manila Stock Exchange as well as Brokerage and Trading Firms.

3.      Harbour Links –Provide ample lifestyle options and retails and leisure business opportunities including a luxury hotel and Harbour Performance Center that offera comprehensive range of ancillary services such as Health & Education, Recreational & Leisure and Multi-Media.
The Port of Manila Financial Center has a Total Land Area of 281,468.641 sq.m. Buildable area of 206, 403.73 sq.m. and Road Network of 75,064.876 sq.m. A Proposal  for the Economic and Financial Investment Zone showcasing a Contemporary Design that complements the Port Area Operations, is Heritage and Landmark.

Goals and Objectives of the Manila Financial Center

1.      Regain the city’s Stature as the Financial Capital of the Philippines
2.      Provide a High-Tech, Sophisticated Environment for International and Regional Banking Integrated with Major Urban and Retail Complex.
3.      Regenerate the Port Area’s Physical and Economic Condition.
4.      Spearheaded the Urban Renewal Development Programs along Manila Bay
5.      Generate Employment and Income for the City of Manila.
Special Features:
Hub or Financial Services & Monetary Activities in the City
Integrated Business and Leisure Environment
Strengths:

·         Single Window for Financial Institution’s Operation
·         Unique Waterfront and Marine Access
·         Holistic Lifestyle offering Living, Working, Retail, Dining and Leisure Facilities
·         Convenient Vehicular Access with well-developed Road Networks
·         Ample Parking Areas based on International Standards.


1.5       URBAN Development Challenges:
Manila Financial Center


1.      Need for Preservation of Iconic Heritage Buildings
2.      Need for Transportation Into International Cruise
3.      Need for Coordination with the PPA ( Philippine Ports Authority)
4.      Need for Several Urban Studies and Plans on the following:

a.       Land Readjustment Studies and Plans for Land Consolidation & Property Management
b.      Mixed-Use & Multi-Use Development Studies focusing on Waterfront Development and Transit- Oriented Development
c.       Green Building Concepts and Technology
d.      Histo-Cultural Heritage Preservation vis-à-vis Tourism Masterplan
e.       Business Improvement District ( BID) / Business Revitalization Zone (BRZ)
f.       Development Strategies and Fiscal Policy States that will encourage major banking institutions to locate/relocate their headquarters in MFC
g.       Urban Development Loop Masterplan
h.      Support Infrastructure and Utilities Masterplan
i.        Disaster Risk-Reduction & Management with Climate Change Adaptation
j.        Traffic Impact Study and Traffic Management Plan
k.      Soil Bearing Capacity Study and Structural Plan Technological Suitability
l.        Environmental Impact Study and  Plans of providing Sustainable Sewage Treatment Plant, Ecological Solid Waste Management. Etc

1.6       POTENTIAL WORK PLAN

The City Planning and Development Office created a workplan to achieve these Goals as the following:


1.      Creation of Technical Group
2.      Coordination with the PPA for their masterplan and clear transition
3.      Engage Professional Urban Planners in crafting Masterplan
4.      Proposal to be submitted to the Office of the Executive Secretary taking into consideration the SWOT of the site , environmental conditions and the histo-cultural and economic significance of the PPA and the proposed Financial Center.
5.      Conduct consultations with other concerned government agencies and stakeholders
6.      Possible Development and Utilization of their areas/ structures towards making a vibrant urban development loop.
7.      Engage Consultants that shall conduct a feasibility study to estimate the commercial potential of this venture and outline possible structures of the PPP and strategies in creating Business Improvement District.

1.7       The Writer’s Note:


This Vision of Urbanism in the City of  Manila as drafted and published during the Lim Administration year 2012 does not have yet the latest release as of this writing time. The Personnel Research Services does not affirm it there were new ideas crafted in the Estrada Adminstration and added that the Vision and Mission of the Local Government are formed individually by each department. As to the latest update from the City Planning and Development Council, it is clear that what is being pursued until now is still that plan started year 2012.


Special Acknowledgement:

The writer would like to acknowledge the kindness of the Manila City Planning and Development Office especially Ms Sarah and Mr. Resty Rebong who were helpful enough in sharing the files. Many thanks to the Team who composed the visuals lent to us; Engr. Rodolfo Calu, Mr. Ramon Navarrete, Mr. Rodolfo Reyes, Mr. Jeff Santos, Mr. Homer Robas, Ms. Marlyn Siglos, EnP Joel R. Oana, Jerome, Harold and Dan of TUP Manila, MIB Photographers and Ms. Janice May Salvador-Campaner. Special thank to Arch Marlou B. Campaner, Uap, Urban Design Division and Ms. Rosemarie Qiambao, HRMO-5,  Chief Personnel, Programs and Research Services.


REFERENCES:

·         Manila’s Urbanization in Retrospect: The Guidon: Shanice Garcia, October 26, 2012
·         Manila City Website
·         Metro Manila Green print 2030: Presented by Hon. Mayors Sherwin Gatchalian and Herbert Bautista, February 23, 2011
·         Emerging Manila: A City of the Rise by Harry Serrano: FutureArc: City Profile, March-April 2013
·         Manila Urban Development Project Proposal, City Planning and Development Office, Manila


**********************************************






No comments:

Post a Comment